Coronary heart disease diagnosis by artificial neural networks including aortic pulse wave velocity index and clinical parameters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease, such as coronary heart disease (CHD), are the main cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. CHD is not entirely predicted by classic risk factors; however, they are preventable. Facing this major problem, the development of novel methods for CHD risk prediction is of practical interest. The purpose of our study was to construct an artificial neural networks (ANNs)-based diagnostic model for CHD risk using a complex of clinical and haemodynamics factors of this disease and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) index. METHODS: A total of 437 patients were included from 2012 to 2017: 99 CHD and 338 non-CHD patients. Theoretical PWV was calculated, on 93 patients free of hypertension, diabetes and CHD, according to age, blood pressure, sex and heart rate. The results were expressed as an index [(measured PWV - theoretical PWV)/theoretical PWV] for each patient. The original database for ANNs included clinical, haemodynamic and laboratory characteristics. Multilayered perceptron ANNs architecture were applied. The performance of prediction was evaluated by accuracy values based on standard definitions. RESULTS: By changing the types of ANNs and the number of input factors applied, we created models that demonstrated 0.63-0.93 accuracy. The best accuracy was obtained with ANNs topology of multilayer perceptron with three hidden layers for models, parameters included by both biological factors, carotid plaque and PWV index. CONCLUSION: ANNs models including a PWV index could be used as promising approaches for predicting CHD risk without the need for invasive diagnostic methods and may help in the clinical decision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".