MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921914961 · doi:10.1007/s00440-020-00967-w

Stability of the Shannon–Stam inequality via the Föllmer process

2020· article· en· W2921914961 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProbability Theory and Related Fields · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsCovarianceBounded functionStochastic processGaussian processStability (learning theory)Entropy (arrow of time)Mathematical proofMathematical financeMultivariate random variable

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We prove stability estimates for the Shannon–Stam inequality (also known as the entropy-power inequality) for log-concave random vectors in terms of entropy and transportation distance. In particular, we give the first stability estimate for general log-concave random vectors in the following form: for log-concave random vectors $$X,Y \in {\mathbb {R}}^d$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , the deficit in the Shannon–Stam inequality is bounded from below by the expression $$\begin{aligned} C \left( \mathrm {D}\left( X||G\right) + \mathrm {D}\left( Y||G\right) \right) , \end{aligned}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtable> <mml:mtr> <mml:mtd> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mfenced> </mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mtd> </mml:mtr> </mml:mtable> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> where $$\mathrm {D}\left( \cdot ~ ||G\right) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>·</mml:mo> <mml:mspace/> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> denotes the relative entropy with respect to the standard Gaussian and the constant C depends only on the covariance structures and the spectral gaps of X and Y . In the case of uniformly log-concave vectors our analysis gives dimension-free bounds. Our proofs are based on a new approach which uses an entropy-minimizing process from stochastic control theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it