MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Avelumab treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in the phase Ib JAVELIN Solid Tumor Study: Updated safety and efficacy analysis with ≥ two years of follow-up.

2019· article· en· W2921946378 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrea B. Apolo, John Ellerton, Jeffrey R. Infante, Manish Agrawal, Michael S. Gordon, Raid Aljumaily, Carolyn D. Britten, Luc Dirix, Keun‐Wook Lee, Matthew H. Taylor, Patrick Schöffski, Ding Wang, Alain Ravaud, Junyuan Xiong, Galit Rosen, James L. Gulley, Manish R. Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAvelumabMetastatic Urothelial CarcinomaInternal medicineResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsJavelinChemotherapyUrologyGastroenterologyPhases of clinical researchOncologySurgeryCancerUrothelial carcinomaBladder cancerImmunotherapyNivolumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

425 Background: Avelumab, a human anti‒PD-L1 IgG1 antibody, is approved for the treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) progressing after platinum chemotherapy in the US, Canada, and Israel. Here, we report an updated pooled analysis of 2 cohorts of avelumab-treated patients (pts) with mUC from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor study (NCT01772004). Methods: Pts with mUC whose disease had progressed after platinum-based therapy or were cisplatin ineligible received avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Tumors were assessed every 6 weeks by independent review (RECIST v1.1). Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety (NCI CTCAE v4.0). Results: As of April 2018, 249 pts had received avelumab and had been followed for ≥2 years (median 2.7 years). Median treatment duration was 12.0 weeks (IQR, 6.0-32.1), and 12 pts (4.8%) remained on treatment. Confirmed ORR in all evaluable pts (n = 242) was 16.5% (95% CI: 12.1%-21.8%; complete response in 4.1%). Median DOR was 20.5 mo (95% CI: 9.7-not estimable), and the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimate of 12-mo DOR was 65.4% (95% CI: 47.0%-78.8%). Median PFS was 1.6 mo (95% CI: 1.4-2.7 mo), median OS was 7.0 mo (95% CI: 5.9-8.5 mo), and the K-M 12-mo and 24-mo OS rates were 35.9% (95% CI: 29.9%-42.0%) and 20.1% (95% CI: 15.2%-25.4%), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 71.1% of pts (177/249), most commonly infusion-related reactions (24.1%), fatigue (18.1%) and rash (18.1%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 11.6% of pts (29/249), most commonly fatigue (1.6%), elevated lipase (1.6%), and pneumonitis (1.2%). Ten pts (4.0%) discontinued avelumab due to a TRAE. There was 1 treatment-related death (pneumonitis). Conclusions: Avelumab showed durable clinical activity and had a manageable safety profile in pts with mUC. A phase 3 trial of avelumab in the maintenance setting after first-line platinum-based therapy for mUC is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01772004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→