MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Stercoral Rectal Ulceration or a Missed Diagnosis of Rectal Carcinoma: Primary Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Rectum Presenting as Fecal Incontinence in an Elderly Female

2018· article· en· W2921960462 on OpenAlexaff
Tooba Tariq, Furqan B. Irfan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsPortage College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRectumAbdomenColonoscopyLaparotomyAbdominoperineal resectionSignet ring cell carcinomaCarcinomaAnal canalPopulationRadiologySurgeryColorectal cancerAdenocarcinomaPathologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the rectum is a rare entity accounting for approximately 1% of all colorectal carcinomas. It arises more frequently in the stomach and is associated with younger patient population and advanced stage on presentation. Constipation is the main factor for development of stercoral ulcer which originates as a result of pressure necrosis of the colorectal mucosa. We describe an atypical case of an elderly female with primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the rectum presenting with fecal incontinence. A 68-year old woman presented with worsening fecal incontinence and hematochezia. Rectal exam revealed a firm tissue in the lateral anal canal. The endoscopic evaluation showed a friable partially necrotic ulcerated lesion at the anorectal junction extending at least 5 cm proximally. The histologic examination of the lesion was diagnostic for a primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the rectum (positive for CK 7 and CK 20 and negative for CDX-2). Computed tomography scan of the abdomen/pelvis revealed rectal wall thickening and MRI of the pelvis demonstrated a low rectal tumor with perianal involvement, clinical T3N2 with an enlarged right external iliac lymph node. Patient received chemo-radiation and later underwent laparotomy with abdominal perineal resection and an end colostomy was performed. Patient had good clinical progress and was discharged to a skilled nursing facility. Patient had a colonoscopy done three years prior for similar symptoms and was noted to have stercoral ulcerations in the rectum but rectal biopsies at that time were unremarkable. This case highlights the following important points. Ulcers particularly stercoral ulcers may herald a concealed malignant disease, hence surveillance colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy should be considered. Also, the diagnosis of primary rectal signet ring cell carcinoma should be investigated in the elderly presenting with the complaint of fecal incontinence.1670_A Figure 1. Colonoscopy revealed a friable, necrotic and ulcerated rectal lesion.1670_B Figure 2. CT scan demonstrated rectal wall thickening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicColorectal and Anal CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207