MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921960653

L'efficacité du broutage par les moutons pour la gestion de la concurrence des herbes adventices dans de jeunes plantations de conifères en Colombie-Britannique au Canada

2013· article· fr· W2921960653 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Ruth Serra

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaMinistry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource OperationsUniversité Laval
KeywordsBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La gestion de la végétation par des moutons (GVM) ou Sheep Vegetation Management (SVM) est une méthode biologique de gestion de la végétation concurrentielle dans des plantations de conifères, relativement récente en Colombie-Britannique (C-B). La présente étude comporte un volet biologique et un volet économique. Le premier se concentre sur la réponse de la croissance de l’épinette hybride (Picea glauca x Picea engelmannii) après le broutage des moutons en comparant des sites pâturés et non pâturés. Le second consiste en une évaluation de la rentabilité du SVM selon le nombre de pâturages appliqués. Les résultats suggèrent que le pâturage favorise la croissance en longueur internodale de l’épinette hybride. Pour rendre la SVM rentable dans les plantations de conifères, il est nécessaire de raccourcir la période de rotation. Ainsi, ce mémoire permet de combler certaines lacunes existantes sur le sujet en vue de promouvoir cette méthode en C-B.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval)Same topicAgroforestry and silvopastoral systemsFrench-language works237,207