MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921985287 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.06218

Astro2020 Science White Paper: First Stars and Black Holes at Cosmic Dawn with Redshifted 21-cm Observations

2019· preprint· en· W2921985287 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan Mirocha, Daniel Jacobs, Joshua S. Dillon, Steve R. Furlanetto, Jonathan C. Pober, Adrian Liu, James Aguirre, Yacine Ali-Haïmoud, Marcelo A. Alvarez, Adam P. Beardsley, George D. Becker, Judd D. Bowman, Patrick C. Breysse, Volker Bromm, Jack O. Burns, Xuelei Chen, Tzu‐Ching Chang, H. C. Chiang, J. D. Cohn, David R. DeBoer, Cora Dvorkin, Anastasia Fialkov, Nickolay Y. Gnedin, B. J. Hazelton, Masui Kiyoshi, Saul A. Kohn, L. V. E. Koopmans, Ely D. Kovetz, Paul La Plante, Adam Lidz, Yin-Zhe Ma, Yi Mao, Andrei Mesinger, Julián B. Muñoz, Steven Murray, Aaron R. Parsons, Jonathan R. Pritchard, Jonathan Sievers, Eric R. Switzer, Nithyanandan Thyagarajan, Eli Visbal, Matías Zaldarriaga

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersHigh Energy PhysicsOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsRedshiftStarsAstrophysicsReionizationCOSMIC cancer databaseIntergalactic travelAstronomySkyBlack hole (networking)Galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The "cosmic dawn" refers to the period of the Universe's history when stars and black holes first formed and began heating and ionizing hydrogen in the intergalactic medium (IGM). Though exceedingly difficult to detect directly, the first stars and black holes can be constrained indirectly through measurements of the cosmic 21-cm background, which traces the ionization state and temperature of intergalactic hydrogen gas. In this white paper, we focus on the science case for such observations, in particular those targeting redshifts z $\gtrsim$ 10 when the IGM is expected to be mostly neutral. 21-cm observations provide a unique window into this epoch and are thus critical to advancing first star and black hole science in the next decade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207