MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2921994018 · doi:10.1109/ropec.2018.8661352

Large Induction Motor Drive Performance Comparison

2018· article· en· W2921994018 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio Valderrábano‐González, Julio C. Rosas‐Caro, Francisco Beltrán-Carbajal, Irvin López-García, Rubén Tapia-Olvera, Hossam A. Gabbar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTotal harmonic distortionControl theory (sociology)Induction motorVoltageTorqueAmplitudeHarmonicController (irrigation)Power (physics)PID controllerHarmonic analysisDistortion (music)Motor driveComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsElectronic engineeringControl engineeringAcousticsElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comparative analysis of the performance of a motor drive with different controller strategies such as Volt-age/frequency (V/F), Proportional, Integral (PI), and Neural Network (NN) controllers to follow speed and torque variations is presented. Bézier profiles are used to reduce peaks in voltage an current when the motor conditions change. Details on the construction of a 84 pulse Voltage Source Converter are provided to follow amplitude, phase and frequency required to drive a large motor. Very low total harmonic distortion is proved and harmonic spectrums illustrate the use of a power filter is evaded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207