Mandibular reconstruction with the scapula tip free flap
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The scapula tip free flap has been described for reconstruction of short mandible defects with extensive soft tissue needs. The versatility of this flap has not been extensively described. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients who underwent mandibulectomy and reconstruction with the scapula tip free flap from 2005 to 2016. Outcomes include bony union, complications, dental rehabilitation, and donor site morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were identified. Average harvested bone was 7.7 cm, with 54% undergoing one osteotomy, and 76.7% harvested as a chimeric flap. Radiographically, average inset bone was 6.6 cm. Complete or partial bony union was observed at 74.4% of proximal and 82.6% of distal osteotomies. A 95% of reconstructions met criteria for dental implants. Mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 21.2. CONCLUSIONS: The scapular tip is an excellent option for reconstruction of segmental mandible defects with the option of osteotomy, excellent bony union rates, low donor site morbidity, and potential for dental rehabilitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it