MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922024619 · doi:10.1017/s0731126500010040

The UN Human Rights Treaty System: Universality at the Crossroads.

2002· article· en· W2922024619 on OpenAlexaff
Louise Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Legal Information · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniversality (dynamical systems)TreatyHuman rightsPolitical scienceLaw and economicsSociologyLawPhysicsCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The UN Human Rights Treaty System: Universality at the Crossroads. By Anne F. Bayefsky. New York: Transnational Publishers, 2001. Pp. xvii, 839. ISBN 1-57105-230-5. US$95.00. - The UN Human Rights System in the 21st Century. Edited by Anne F. Bayefsky. The Hague: Kluwer, 2000. Pp. xx, 1116. ISBN 90-411-1415-7. US$287.00. - Volume 30 Issue 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.011
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0090.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Legal InformationSame topicInternational Law and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207