MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922026638 · doi:10.1117/12.2512964

Frequency-dependent MTF and DQE of photon-counting x-ray imaging detectors (Conference Presentation)

2019· article· en· W2922026638 on OpenAlexaff
Jesse Tanguay, Nicholas Mantella, Ian A. Cunningham

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical Imaging · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British ColumbiaToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetective quantum efficiencyOptical transfer functionPhysicsDetectorX-ray detectorOpticsPhoton countingNoise (video)PhotonShot noiseImage qualityComputer scienceImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical modeling of the performance of x-ray imaging detectors enables understanding relationships between the physics of x-ray detection and x-ray image quality, and enables theoretical optimization of novel x-ray imaging techniques and technologies. We present an overview of a framework for theoretical modeling of the frequency-dependent signal and noise properties of single-photon-counting (SPC) and energy-resolving x-ray imaging detectors. We show that the energy-response function, large-area gain, modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS) (including spatio-energetic noise correlations) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of SPC and energy-resolving x-ray imaging detectors are related through the probability density function (PDF) describing the number electron-hole (e-h) pairs collected in detector elements following individual x-ray interactions. We demonstrate how a PDF-transfer approach can be used to model analytically the MTF and NPS, including spatio-energetic noise correlations, of SPC and energy-resolving x-ray imaging detectors. Our approach enables modeling the combined effects of stochastic conversion gain, electronic noise, characteristic emission, characteristic reabsorption, coulomb repulsion and diffusion of e-h pairs and energy thresholding on the MTF and NPS. We present applications of this framework to (1) analysis of the frequency-dependent DQE of SPC systems that use cadmium telluride (CdTe) x-ray converters, and (2) analysis of spatio-energetic noise correlations in CdTe energy-resolving x-ray detectors. The developed framework provides a platform for theoretical optimization of next-generation SPC and energy-resolving x-ray imaging detectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical ImagingSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207