MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922065410 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.069

A70 PROTEASE-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR 2 DRIVES COLONIC EPITHELIAL WOUND HEALING VIA EGFR TRANSACTIVATION

2019· article· en· W2922065410 on OpenAlexaff
Mahesha N.S. Bandara, Wallace K. MacNaughton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidermal growth factor receptorBiologyEpidermal growth factorTransactivationReceptorProteasesProtease-activated receptor 2Wound healingEpitheliumCell biologyCancer researchImmunologyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compromised intestinal barrier function is a prominent feature of inflammatory bowel diseases. Epithelial restitution is required in the resolution of inflammation. For this to occur epithelial cells need to transition to migratory phenotype from its normal barrier phenotype. The inflammatory milieu of the intestinal epithelium contains a variety proteases which are upregulated in IBD patients and which are agonists of protease-activated receptors (PARs). PAR2 is widely present in the gastrointestinal tract and PAR2 activation can induce expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the intestinal epithelium. However, the specific roles of PAR2 activation in IBD remain unclear. We hypothesized that PAR2 activation drives COX-2 and EGFR dependent epithelial wound healing. CMT93 mouse intestinal epithelial cells were grown to confluence. PAR2 mRNA expression was detected by RT-PCR and confirmed by cDNA sequencing. PAR2 A5 antibody was used to detect total PAR2 by immunocytochemistry and the tight junction protein, ZO-1, demarcated apical and basolateral surfaces. PAR2 was activated by selective activating peptide 2-furoyl-LIGRLO-NH2 (2fLI). The functionality of PAR2 was tested by measuring intracellular Ca2+, since it has been shown that PAR2 activation elicits Ca2+-dependent signaling. Scratch wounds were made in post-confluent CMT93 monolayers and imaged using the IncuCyte™ live-cell imaging system over 24 hours. COX-2 protein was measured by western blotting and inhibited in wound healing assays with NS-398 (10 mM). EGFR was inhibited by the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor PD153035 (10 nM) and activated using human EGF (10 ng/ml and 5 ng/ml). Immunocytochemistry revealed that PAR2 is expressed on mostly basolateral membranes with some expression on apical membrane and punctate immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm in polarized cells. Concentration-response studies revealed that 2.5 mM 2fLI elicited the highest intracellular Ca2+ response (EC50 = 0.5 mM). PAR2 activation at 10 mM 2fLI significantly increased wound healing (P£ 0.0001). However, PAR2 activation by 2fLI did not induce COX-2 expression, nor did COX-2 inhibition alter PAR2-induced wound healing. PAR2-induced wound healing was inhibited by the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (P ≤ 0.001). Moreover, 2fLI induced wound healing is comparable to the that of EGF (5 ng/ml). PAR2 activation drives wound healing in CMT93 epithelial cells through the transactivation of EGFR and not through induction of COX-2. This study enhances our understanding of how proteases in the inflammatory milieu may drive epithelial restitution and mucosal healing. CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207