MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922080685 · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.063421

Fast and dense magneto-optical traps for strontium

2019· article· en· W2922080685 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Stepan Snigirev, A. J. Park, A. Heinz, Immanuel Bloch, Sebastian Blatt

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStrontiumPhysicsMagneto opticalAdiabatic processSawtooth waveSimple (philosophy)Atomic physicsLaserOpticsQuantum mechanicsMagnetic fieldNuclear physicsTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We improve the efficiency of sawtooth-wave adiabatic-passage cooling for strontium atoms in three dimensions and combine it with standard narrow-line laser cooling. With this technique, we create strontium magneto-optical traps with $6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{7}$ bosonic $^{88}\mathrm{Sr}$ ($1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{7}$ fermionic $^{87}\mathrm{Sr}$) atoms at phase-space densities of $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$ ($1.4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$). Our method is simple to implement and is faster and more robust than traditional cooling methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207