MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922102730 · doi:10.14510/araj.2019.4236

Technical milestones on cogeneration energy production at Paroseni central heating power plant

2019· article· en· W2922102730 on OpenAlex
Mihaela Dana Racz, Sorin Mihai Radu, Dan Codruț Petrilean

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Romanian Academy of Arts and Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicRenewable energy and sustainable power systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCogenerationProduction (economics)Environmental sciencePower (physics)Energy (signal processing)Power stationWaste managementElectricity generationEngineeringElectrical engineeringEconomicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The production of electricity in Romania, from the beginning until today, was based on central heating power plants, mainly with its own energy resources. Power Plant Paroseni operates under subcritical parameters, it is part of the National Energy System and has the objective of producing thermal energy for the cities of the Jiu Valley and electricity supplied to the National Energy System. The purpose of the paper is to present historical and technical references regarding its structure and functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it