MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922150698 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.992

Application of artificial neural network in the prediction of ambient temperature for a cloud-based smart dual fuel switching system

2019· article· en· W2922150698 on OpenAlexaff
Gulsun Demirezen, Alan S. Fung

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHVACAutomotive engineeringArtificial neural networkMATLABEnergy consumptionSoftwareReal-time computingSimulationGreenhouse gasComputer scienceEngineeringAir conditioningArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This preliminary study is part of a bigger cloud-based smart dual fuel switching system (SDFSS) for hybrid heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. The SDFSS being developed enables flexible and cost-optimized control between the natural gas furnace and air source heat pump (ASHP), allowing simultaneous reduction in energy costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To meet the optimal energy consumption requirements and satisfaction of the residents, the employment of smart sensors and software are broadly used. The data regarding the outdoor temperature plays the most crucial role in operating and controlling the SDFSS optimally. This study introduces a novel approach to obtaining the outdoor temperature that could potentially replace smart sensors with a data-driven model utilizing weather station data at time resolutions of 2 minutes and 1 hour. In this work, a computer program was implemented under Matlab R2018a software. This study found that the artificial neural network (ANN) model was able to predict the outdoor temperature within 0.95 R error in average, demonstrating ANN to be a powerful tool in predicting outdoor temperature. Thus, the model proposed can be confidently implemented as an alternative to temperature sensors in automated systems, in hybrid energy systems or other energy systems requiring accurate ambient temperature measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207