Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le deuxième chapitre de la section Mots clés de la série « Anthologie du phem » entend rendre compte du succès rencontré par la figure de Henri Bergson dans le domaine musical durant la première moitié du xxe siècle. Dans la presse généraliste comme dans les revues musicales spécialisées, à travers l’utilisation de notions forgées initialement par Bergson – telles la « durée » ou l’« intuition » –, un cadre théorique est élaboré, menant à la redéfinition de l’oeuvre musicale et à la défense d’une esthétique moderniste. Les trois articles sélectionnés correspondent à trois moments importants de l’assimilation de la philosophie bergsonienne dans le domaine musical, depuis les premiers jalons conceptuels posés par Louis Laloy en 1914 jusqu’à la récupération des idées phares de Bergson, désormais entrées dans le vocabulaire courant, par le compositeur Désiré Pâque en 1935.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".