MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Barns rett til beskyttelse i foreldretvister om samvær – hvilken innflytelse har Rt. 2013 s. 1329 hatt på lagmannsrettspraksis?

2019· article· no· W2922192845 on OpenAlexaff
Malin Karlsen, Kristin Skjørten

Bibliographic record

VenueTidsskrift for familierett arverett og barnevernrettslige spørsmål · 2019
Typearticle
Languageno
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsEmergent BioSolutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barneloven har blitt endret flere ganger de senere år med formål om å styrke barneperspektivet i foreldretvister og gi barn økt beskyttelse mot vold og overgrep. I 2013 avsa Høyesterett en dom som gikk langt i å nekte far samvær med sin fem år gamle datter, sammenlignet med tidligere høyesterettsdommer hvor risiko for overgrep har vært et tema for vurderinger av samvær. I høyesterettsdommen fra 2013 blir også flere momenter fra senere års lovendringer lagt til grunn for avgjørelsen. I denne artikkelen ser vi nærmere på hvilken innflytelse denne dommen har fått for senere lagmannsrettspraksis i saker med påstander om vold eller overgrep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTidsskrift for familierett arverett og barnevernrettslige spørsmålSame topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207