MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922195708

Predictors of depression in older adults with multiple sclerosis

2018· dissertation· en· W2922195708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tanaya Chatterjee

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)AnxietyHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleMedicineMoodPopulationPsychiatryClinical psychologyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada’s growing population of older people with MS (PwMS) has warranted a closer look into factors associated with depression that may interfere with healthy aging. At the same time, researchers, clinicians, and medical professionals treating PwMS with mood disorders have spoken about the difficulty they face when having to determine a diagnosis of depression in this population. This difficulty arises because both MS and depression share various psychological and neurological symptoms (e.g., fatigue, pain, sleep difficulties, psychomotor retardation, and cognitive difficulties). It is also found that these overlapped symptoms vary when completing a self-report measure of depression, versus when medically diagnosed by a psychiatrist. As such, we aim to investigate the personal and disease-related factors that are associated with self-reported depressive symptoms and medically diagnosed depression (i.e. depression diagnosed by a medical professional). Following this, we aim to determine the risk factors for depression in older PwMS. This study used secondary data collected from the original study, the Canadian survey of health, lifestyle, and aging with multiple sclerosis. Data of the original study was collected from 743 Canadians (> 55 years of age and living with MS for >20 years). In this present study, presence of self-reported depressive symptoms was defined as a score of ≥ 8 on the depression component of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Presence of medically diagnosed depression was determined by the item that asked participants if they have received a diagnosis of depression by their medical professional. Logistic regression was used to identify variables that predicted depression. Self-reported depressive symptoms were found in 30.5% of the population, while medically diagnosed depression was found in 25.7%. 11.7% of PwMS had both self-identified depressive symptoms and were diagnosed with depression by their medical professional. Low social support, high perceived disability, and additional comorbid physical conditions were independent predictors of depression in older PwMS in our cohort. Depression is prevalent in older PwMS. Clinicians should be cognizant of the overlap of symptoms between MS and depression and should employ possible ways to minimize over-diagnosing or underdiagnosing depression in this population. Identifying risk factors for depression is imperative because at-risk individuals may be thoroughly assessed for depression and will be able to receive treatment more promptly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207