Stomoxyinae Flies in Thailand: A Précis, with Abridged Taxonomic Key to the Adult Species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stomoxyinae flies (Diptera: Muscidae) are cosmopolitan obligate hematophagous insects of medical and veterinary importance. The subfamily Stomoxyinae includes 51 known species within 10 genera. Five genera, Stomoxys, Haematobosca, Haematobia, Haematostoma, and Stygeromyia, represent important livestock pests causing substantial economic losses in the commercial animal industry. The majority of Stomoxyinae research and control efforts have focused on Stomoxys species. Following the earliest descriptions of Stomoxyinae in Asia in the beginning of the past century, the first published list of species identified in Thailand did not occur until 1978. Currently, there are 11 confirmed species in the country with 3 others suspected present. This includes six species of Stomoxys with Stomoxys calcitrans the most common and widespread in the country. Since 1978, 20 publications, 17 of which since 2006, have covered original research on Stomoxyinae fly biology, species distribution, patterns of daily and seasonal activity, gene flow, and phylogenetics in Thailand. All Stomoxyinae-related published research from Thailand through 2017 is reviewed herein, and include an updated identification key to the Stomoxyinae genera and all known or suspected species, both male and female adults, present in Thailand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".