MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922220994 · doi:10.4153/s0008414x20000784

Shortest paths in arbitrary plane domains

2020· article· en· W2922220994 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic and geometric function theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPath (computing)HomotopyEuclidean shortest pathShortest path problemPlane (geometry)Open setEuclidean geometrySet (abstract data type)Simple (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let $\Omega $ be a connected open set in the plane and $\gamma : [0,1] \to \overline {\Omega }$ a path such that $\gamma ((0,1)) \subset \Omega $ . We show that the path $\gamma $ can be “pulled tight” to a unique shortest path which is homotopic to $\gamma $ , via a homotopy h with endpoints fixed whose intermediate paths $h_t$ , for $t \in [0,1)$ , satisfy $h_t((0,1)) \subset \Omega $ . We prove this result even in the case when there is no path of finite Euclidean length homotopic to $\gamma $ under such a homotopy. For this purpose, we offer three other natural, equivalent notions of a “shortest” path. This work generalizes previous results for simply connected domains with simple closed curve boundaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicAnalytic and geometric function theoryFrench-language works237,207