MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922238645 · doi:10.14510/araj.2019.4238

Assessments about the energy efficiency of PCM in fresh AIR-COOLING systems in different building types

2019· article· en· W2922238645 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Octavian G. Pop, Mugur C. Bălan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Romanian Academy of Arts and Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitatea Tehnică din Cluj-Napoca
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceArchitectural engineeringEfficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)MeteorologyEngineeringGeographyElectrical engineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy efficient technologies are recommended in the building sector, as buildings have proven to be high energy consumers.With the increase in global warming air cooling systems are more energy demanding.To enhance the energy efficiency of air-cooling systems phase change materials are considered due to their capacity of storing high amounts of cold.This technology must be designed and operated according to the number of occupants, type of activity and schedule of the building.This study presents an investigation of PCM based active cooling in a building considered to be an office compound, school and hospital.The performance indicator COP was used to evaluate the efficiency.It was found that the enhanced system was most efficient for the office building (COP=7.40)and least efficient for the hospital building (COP=5.89) .The enhanced system was also compared with a classic reference system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Romanian Academy of Arts and SciencesSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207