MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922254784 · doi:10.1190/geo2017-0498.1

On closed-form expressions for the approximate electromagnetic response of a sphere interacting with a thin sheet — Part 1: Theory in the frequency and time domain

2019· article· en· W2922254784 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques K. Desmarais

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverburdenResistive touchscreenTime domainFrequency domainElectrical conductorMathematical analysisElectromagnetic fieldGeologyGeometryMechanicsPhysicsMathematicsComputer scienceGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In mineral exploration and geologic mapping of igneous and metamorphic terranes, the background is often dominantly resistive. The most important electromagnetic interaction is between a discrete conductor and an overlying sheet of conductive overburden (e.g., glacial clays or weathering products of the basement rocks). To enable the electromagnetic modeling of these common situations, here I provide closed-form expressions for the approximate electromagnetic response of a sphere embedded in highly resistive rocks and interacting with an overlying thin sheet. The sphere is assumed to be dipolar and excited by a locally uniform field. The expressions in the time and frequency domains are represented as sums of complete and incomplete cylindrical functions. New asymptotic approximations are provided for the efficient evaluation of the required incomplete cylindrical functions. The frequency-domain formulas are validated by numerical transformation to the time domain and comparison to the time-domain solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207