MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922267521 · doi:10.1117/12.2511052

Long lived intralipid-infused tissue phantoms: control and characterization of scattering characteristics (Conference Presentation)

2019· article· en· W2922267521 on OpenAlexaff
Glenn H. Chapman, Magda G. Sanchez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomScatteringMaterials scienceOpticsLight scatteringForward scatterBiomedical engineeringPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Building long lived test phantoms that simulate the scattering characteristics of biological tissue is needed in for testing optical methods targeted at imaging through tissue. Test phantoms are needed as real tissue samples optical characteristics (scattering coefficients µs and anisotropy factor g) varies greatly between samples and change rapidly with time. Our ongoing work has created long term stable phantoms with lifetimes of more than 6 years and maintaining consistent optical characteristics which mimic skin characteristics. These stable test phantom are created by an intralipid-infused agar layers 1 to 6 mm thickness Varying the intralipid concentration allows control of the scattering parameters with typical values of µs = 20/cm, g = 0.95. By encapsulating the intralipid-infused agar within a clear polymer it stabilizes for long lifetimes and allows creation a varying thicknesses, scattering characteristics and shapes. To characterize these test phantom we developed an enhanced technique where the scattered light from a laser beam passing through the test phantom is captured using a 36x24mm digital camera sensor to capture. This gives over 6 million measurements over a +/- 12 degree range, with typically 20,000 measurements at 2300 angular bins of 0.005 deg. For analysis these measurements of scattering values at a wide range of angles used a Matlab program to identify the scattering center and the angular positions. Fitted scattering models extracted the µs and g parameters for each test phantom Consistent results were obtained using a Henyey-Greenstein two-term model, probably because the Agar and intralipid impacted the scattering separately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207