MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922328150 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.061

A62 LIVER CLEANSE, A SOLUTION OR PROBLEM? A CASE REPORT

2019· article· en· W2922328150 on OpenAlexaff
D Moza, C Margenian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineJaundiceLiver injuryHepatitisFulminant hepatitisFulminant hepatic failureLiver function testsLiver functionCirrhosisLiver biopsyNatural historyGastroenterologyInternal medicineLiver transplantationBiopsyTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a growing trend towards seeking natural supplements to “boost” the body even in the absence of illnesses. One such trend is the use of “liver cleanses” which claim to detoxify the liver. These products are available over the counter and majority of them have not been tested, approved or regulated by authorities. There is no proof of their effectiveness and in fact, they may be harmful to the body. We present a case of fulminant hepatitis induced by Himalaya Herbal Healthcare LiverCare, a proprietary formula of unknown herbs, promoted as “a herbal supplement that promotes detox and normal liver enzyme levels, with antioxidant properties that support liver cell integrity” . A previously healthy 54 year old woman presented to her family doctor with progressive jaundice, generalized itching and dark urine along with dyspepsia. She was found to have transaminitis and synthetic liver dysfunction. There was no travel history or infectious symptoms. The only medication she was taking was a “liver cleanse” (Himalaya Herbal Healthcare LiverCare Himalaya LiverCare and Himalaya Triphala) prescribed by her naturopath one yearfew weeks prio agor for unclear indications. A liver biopsy showed submassive necrosis and fulminant hepatitis in keeping with drug induced liver injury (DILI) most likely due to the liver cleanse. The liver cleanse was stopped and her clinical symptoms and liver function tests improved .but A year later she developed drug induced auto-immune hepatitis and one year later cirrhosis. She was put on transplant list. While waiting for her transplant, she continued to take the patient continued to take other unidentified herbal medications recommended by her naturopath, including some for “adrenal fatigue” for the liver and was found to. develop auto-immune hepatitis Sand liver cirrhosis of which she ultimately passed awaydied two years after initial biopsy. N/A This case highlights the importance of considering herbal supplements in the differential for fulminant hepatitis, and drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis and cirrhosis while actively seeking a history of use from patients. It raises concerns about certain liver cleanses causing hepatotoxicity rather than detoxifying the liver as they claim and calls for better public education and controlled trials to evaluate and regulate such natural products. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207