MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922369615 · doi:10.1080/10255842.2019.1584795

Customized k-nearest neighbourhood analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using 3D markerless asymmetry analysis

2019· article· en· W2922369615 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersSick Kids FoundationStollery Children’s Hospital FoundationScoliosis Research Society
KeywordsTorsoScoliosisMedicineIdiopathic scoliosisRadiographyCurvatureDeformityLumbarNuclear medicineRadiologyArtificial intelligenceOrthodonticsMathematicsSurgeryAnatomyComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a 3D spinal deformity characterized by curvature and rotation of the spine. Markerless surface topography (ST) analysis has been proposed for diagnosing and monitoring AIS to reduce the X-ray radiation exposure to patients. This method captures scans of the cosmetic deformity of the torso using visible, radiation-free light. The asymmetry analysis of the torso, represented as a deviation contour map with deviation patches outlining the areas of cosmetic asymmetries, has previously been shown to predict the severity and progression of the condition in comparison with radiographs, by using classification trees. While the classification results were promising, it was reported that some mild curves were erroneously diagnosed. Furthermore, this approach is highly sensitive to threshold values selected in the decision trees. Therefore, this study aims to define a custom Neighbourhood Classifier algorithm for AIS classification to improve the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of predicting curve severity and curve progression in AIS. Curve severity was predicted with 80% accuracy (sensitivity = 81%; specificity = 79%) for thoracic-thoracolumbar curves and 72% (sensitivity = 93%; specificity = 53%) for lumbar curves. This represents an improvement over the previous method with curve severity accuracies of 77% and 63% for thoracic-thoracolumbar and lumbar curves, respectively. Additionally, curve progression was predicted with 93% accuracy (sensitivity = 83%; specificity = 95%) representing a substantial improvement over the previous method with an accuracy of 59%. The current method has shown the potential to further reduce radiation exposure for AIS patients by avoiding X-rays for mild and non-progressive curves identified using ST analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.014
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it