Evidence of decreased gap junction coupling between astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the anterior cingulate cortex of depressed suicides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Glial dysfunction is a major feature in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. While altered astrocyte (AS) and oligodendrocyte-lineage (OL) cell functions have been associated with depression, the crosstalk between these two major glial cell types has never been assessed in that context. AS are potent regulators of OL cells and myelination, in part through gap junction-mediated intercellular communication made possible by the heterotypic coupling of AS-specific (Cx30 and Cx43) and OL-specific (Cx32 and Cx47) connexins, allowing cytosolic transport and metabolic support to OL cells. Because changes in the expression of AS-specific connexins have been previously reported in the brain of depressed individuals, this study aimed at addressing the integrity of AS-OL coupling in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) of depressed suicides. Using immunofluorescence and confocal imaging, we characterized the distribution of the AS-specific Cx30 in the ACC, and mapped its expression onto oligodendrocyte somas and myelinated axons as well as brain vasculature in post-mortem brain samples from depressed suicides (N=48) and matched controls (N=23). The differential gene expression of key components of the gap junction nexus was also screened through RNA-sequencing dataset previously generated by our group, and validated by quantitative real-time PCR. Our results indicate that Cx30 expression mapping to OL cells is selectively decreased in depressed suicides, an effect that was associated with decreased expression of OL-specific connexins Cx32 and Cx47, as well as the downregulation of major connexin-interacting proteins essential for the scaffolding, trafficking and function of gap junction channels. These results provide a first evidence of impaired gap junction mediated communication between astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the ACC of individuals with mood disorders. These changes in glial coupling are likely to have significant impact on brain function, and may contribute to the altered OL function previously reported in this brain region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".