MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922407351 · doi:10.2134/agronj2018.03.0183

Yield and Water Use in Almond under Deficit Irrigation

2019· article· en· W2922407351 on OpenAlex
Gabriel Collin, Jean Caron, Guillaume Létourneau, Jacques Gallichand

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrrigationEnvironmental scienceDeficit irrigationWater useEvapotranspirationAgronomyOrchardIrrigation managementSan JoaquinYield (engineering)Water-use efficiencySoil waterCropBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas Maximum yields were obtained with wireless real‐time tensiometers initiating irrigation at –45 kPa. A significant 16% reduction in water use relative to the grower control was achieved by initiating irrigation at –45 kPa with no yield reduction. Almond crop is sensitive to water management, as being too wet (initiation at ‐35 kPa) or too dry (initiation at –55 kPa) reduced yield by about 11.0 and 11.3%, respectively. ABSTRACT In North America, almond [ Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb] trees are grown almost exclusively in the Central Valley of California. Research on deficit irrigation is needed to improve water productivity. Real‐time technology assessing soil water potential to manage irrigation initiation has led to significant improvements in water productivity in other crops. The objective of this study was to examine the possibility of using real‐time tensiometry for irrigation to trigger irrigation events and to generate water savings without affecting crop yield. The yield responses and water consumption of mature almond trees were quantified from 2012 to 2015 for four different irrigation strategies in a commercial orchard located in the San Joaquin Valley in California. Three of the treatments were based on soil water potential threshold (SWPT) measurements and the fourth on the grower’s current management practices, which used estimated crop evapotranspiration (ET c ). The SWPT treatments were based on three different stress levels: wet (–35 kPa), medium (−45 kPa), and dry (−55 kPa). There was no significant difference in marketable yield between the grower irrigation strategy and the medium treatment, although the latter used 139 mm less water as a yearly average. In the dry treatment, there was 10% less water applied relative to the medium treatments and 30% less than the grower treatment but a 10% yield reduction compared with the medium and grower treatments. These results indicate that irrigation management for almond could be optimized by initiating irrigation at –45 kPa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it