MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 18556: Renal Sympathetic Denervation Modulates Cardiac Repolarization in a Post Myocardial Infarction Pig Model

2015· article· en· W2922476376 on OpenAlexaff
Govind Krishna Kumar Nair, Sigfús Gizurarson, Nicholas Jackson, Benjamin King, Xudong Hu, Andrew Ramadeen, Nima Zamiri, Andreu Porta‐Sánchez, M. Kusha, Stéphane Massé, Patrick F.H. Lai, Abdul Al‐Hesayen, John Graham, Paul Dorian, Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQT intervalCardiologyInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionRepolarizationElectrocardiographyElectrophysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Changes in cardiac repolarization parameters such as QT interval and QT dispersion have been implicated in cardiac arrhythmogenesis following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). These parameters are susceptible to sympathetic modulation. We therefore hypothesized that renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) may produce potential anti-arrhythmic actions through its effects on cardiac repolarization. Methods: Fifteen pigs randomized to AMI & RDN (6 pigs), AMI & sham RDN (6 pigs) and sham MI & sham RDN (3 pigs) underwent percutaneous occlusion of the mid to distal LAD to achieve AMI. 2 weeks after infarction, the St. Jude EnligHTN® basket catheter was used to perform RDN bilaterally. Cardiac repolarization parameters were measured at 3 time points over the course of the 3 week study: baseline (immediately before MI), midpoint (2 weeks post MI; at time of RDN) and end (1 week post RDN). ECG data were acquired from limb leads. Results: In a ten beat span, the range in the durations of the QT interval was seen to increase from 18+/-7ms to 19+/-11ms in the real AMI & sham RDN group while in the real AMI & real RDN group it decreased from 17+/-5ms to 14+/-5ms (p=0.11). The mean QT interval which increased by 25% in the real AMI & sham RDN group saw only an 11% increase in the real AMI & real RDN group (p=0.048). The standard deviation of the average QT intervals post AMI, which quantifies the reduction in global dispersion of repolarization, saw a 41% decrease with RDN compared to an 8% decrease with sham RDN. The temporal dispersion of repolarization was also diminished by RDN. The dispersion of T wave peak to T wave end durations which increased in the real AMI & sham RDN group (from 15+/-6ms to 22+/-10ms), was decreased in the real AMI & real RDN group (from 19+/-7ms to 16+/-6ms) (p=0.05). T wave alternans values displayed no significant response to RDN (p=0.977). Conclusions: Adverse changes in cardiac repolarization parameters were attenuated via renal denervation in this post infarct pig model. These effects may mitigate post infarct arrhythmogenesis but require further study to evaluate the influence of local, reflex and circulating mediators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→