MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922543726 · doi:10.22215/etd/2018-12942

Utilization of Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy and Rheology for Sludge Characterization and Monitoring

2018· dissertation· en· W2922543726 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan Smyth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRheologyAbsorbanceEffluentAerobic digestionActivated sludgeUltraviolet visible spectroscopySewage treatmentChemistryUltravioletWastewaterPulp and paper industryCharacterization (materials science)Environmental scienceProcess engineeringWaste managementMaterials scienceChromatographyEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringNanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Operation of sludge treatment processes mainly relies on manual control, which is far from ideal.There is a need for new approaches to optimize the operation of sludge treatment processes and wastewater plants.This research aims to identify new tools and methods that can be used for inline and real-time characterization and monitoring of sludge.Two methods that were examined in this thesis that have potential to be used as monitoring technologies were ultraviolet/visible spectrophotometry and torque rheology.Effluent and filtrate absorbance measurements in the ultraviolet/visible range were successful in monitoring the progress of aerobic digestion.Torque rheology was not found to be sensitive enough for monitoring aerobic digestion of sludge, however it was able to detect changes in the total solids content of anaerobically digested sludge.Torque rheology detected significant changes in anaerobically digested sludge when trivalent cations were added, but not when divalent cations were added.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207