MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922591079 · doi:10.5430/ijba.v10n2p147

Characteristics of Business Models, Business Diversification and Price Segmentation Strategies of Wineries in the Wine Route of Baja California, Mexico

2019· article· en· W2922591079 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
WU Ji-zhong, Sergio Cesaretti

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Business Administration · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWine Industry and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversification (marketing strategy)RevenueWineBusinessVineyardMarketingMarket segmentationProduction (economics)EconomicsFinanceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the characteristics of business models used by wineries in Baja California, Mexico wine route. It also identified strategies being used regarding price segmentation and business diversification, and how business diversification relates to production performance. The results showed a limited presence in the supermarket channel, vineyard/land and wine-making facilities/machinery being considered as the most valuable resources, a growing tendency of companies having lodging facilities, a low differentiation in key activities performed, high differentiation regarding revenue generation structure, three revenue generation clusters containing the majority of the companies, companies with a diversification strategy outperformed those with single business strategies in regards to case production during a five year period, and the price segments from $251 to $600 Mexican pesos for 750ml bottles of wine being the most popular ones. This study used a non-random sampling technique to collect primary data in the form of surveys and face-to-face structured in-depth interviews. A total of 65 companies, accounting for approximately 55% of the total wine producers in the area, were interviewed during the data 1-month data collection period (July 2018). Out of these 65 companies, 50 provided complete useable data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Business AdministrationSame topicWine Industry and TourismFrench-language works237,207