MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922603812 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3148.1.41

Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness

2011· article· en· W2922603812 on OpenAlexaff
E.J. van Nieukerken, Lauri Kaila, Ian J. Kitching, Niels P. Kristensen, David C. Lees, Joël Minet, Charles Mitter, Marko Mutanen, Jerome C. Regier, Thomas J. Simonsen, Niklas Wahlberg, Shen‐Horn Yen, Reza Zahiri, David Adamski, Joaquín Baixeras, Daniel Bartsch, Bengt Bengtsson, John W. Brown, Sibyl R. Bucheli, Donald R. Davis, Jurate De Prins, Willy De Prins, Marc E. Epstein, Patricia Gentili-Poole, Cees Gielis, Peter Hättenschwiler, Axel Hausmann, Jeremy D. Holloway, Axel Kallies, Ole Karsholt, Akito Y. Kawahara, Sjaak J.C. Koster, Mikhail V. Kozlov, J. Donald Lafontaine, Gerardo Lamas, Jean‐François Landry, Sangmi Lee, Matthias Nuß, Kyu‐Tek Park, Carla M. Penz, Jadranka Rota, Alexander Schintlmeister, Christian Schmidt, Jae‐Cheon Sohn, M. Alma Solís, Г. М. Тарманн, Andrew Warren, Susan J. Weller, Roman V. Yakovlev, Vadim V. Zolotuhin, Andreas Zwick

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection AgencyAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónBelgian Federal Science Policy Office
KeywordsBiologyLepidoptera genitaliaZhàngSpecies richnessBiodiversityEcologyZoologyArchaeologyChinaHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations594
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207