MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922687306 · doi:10.32400/gc.13.02.19919.2018

EVALUASI EFEKTIVITAS SISTEM PENGENDALIAN INTERNAL DALAM PROSEDUR HIBAH PADA SATUAN KERJA KANTOR WILAYAH KEMENTERIAN AGAMA PROVINSI SULAWESI UTARA

2018· article· en· W2922687306 on OpenAlexaff
Nazlia Djakaria, Ventje Ilat, Natalia Y. T. Gerungai

Bibliographic record

VenueGOING CONCERN JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristian ministryInternal controlControl (management)BusinessResearch methodDescriptive researchBusiness administrationDescriptive statisticsEngineering managementManagementOperations managementProcess managementAccountingPolitical scienceEngineeringSociologyMathematicsLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internal Control System is a system of business or social system that the company consists of organizational structure, methods and measures to maintain and direct the way the company to move in accordance with corporate goals and programs. The internal control system is used to control all activities undertaken by the company including the grant procedure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the internal control system of grant procedures in the Regional Office of the Ministry of Religion Affairs of North Sulawesi Province. In this study the type of data used is qualitative data, while for data sources using primary data and secondary data, and the method of analysis used is descriptive analysis method. Based on the results of the research, it is concluded that the grant procedure in the Regional Office of the Ministry of Religion Affairs of North Sulawesi Province has been effective because it has fulfilled the existing components of internal control.Keywords: Internal Control, Grant Procedures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGOING CONCERN JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSISame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207