Portable fixed dynamometry to quantify ankle dorsiflexion force
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction : Quantifying muscle strength is critical in clinical and research settings. A rapid and objective method is ideal. The primary objective of this study was to examine the reliability of a novel device, the rapid objective quantification― tibialis anterior (ROQ‐TA), which quantifies the dorsiflexion force of the tibialis anterior, and to assess its validity against isokinetic dynamometry (IKD). Methods : Ankle dorsiflexion of 20 healthy subjects was assessed by 3 modalities, ROQ‐TA, manual muscle testing, and isokinetic dynamometry, over 2 testing sessions. Results : The intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC (2,1) ] for reliability was 0.872 (0.677–0.949) for the ROQ‐TA and 0.892 (0.728–0.957) for IKD. For validity, the ICC (2,1) values for the ROQ‐TA and IKD were in good agreement, with 0.672 (0.17–0.87) in the first testing session and 0.769 (0.42–0.91) in the second session. Discussion : The ROQ‐TA is a valid and reliable device to test ankle dorsiflexion force in a healthy population. Muscle Nerve , 2018
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".