MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922802510 · doi:10.22215/etd/2018-12842

Novel Solutions and Applications of the Object Partitioning Problem

2018· dissertation· en· W2922802510 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceBlock (permutation group theory)Theoretical computer scienceObject (grammar)Big dataProcess (computing)AutomatonCellular automatonDistributed computingData miningAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageMathematicsGeographyCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis considers the fundamental problem of "partitioning" which is allpervasive in computer science. It has applications in "Big Data" because the vast amounts of data encountered in "Big Data" applications cannot be processed in a single block, but are better analyzed when it is partitioned in various monolithic units. It also has direct applications in numerous areas including databases, process scheduling, mapping and image retrieval. In this research we consider a specific instantiation of the Object Partitioning Problem, namely the Equi-Partitioning Problem (EPP), in which the partitions are equi-sized. In particular we concentrate on the various Learning Automata (LA)-based solutions. In this regard, the Object Migration Automata (OMA), and its variants have been the benchmark solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207