Effect of Dehulling on Proximate Composition and Functional Properties of Lima Bean (Phaseolus lunatus) Grown in Enugu State
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This physical properties, proximate composition and functional properties of Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) obtained from Enugu State were studied. The result obtained for dehulled and undehulled lima bean with respect to proximate composition gave the following value for dehulled lima bean: moisture 7.18%, crude fat 4.67%, protein 14.24%, crude fiber 17.89%, ash 0.66% and carbohydrate 55.36% while undehulled lima bean contents were moisture 4.30%, crude fat 2.62%, protein 16.31%, crude fiber 18.00%, ash content 2.13%, carbohydrate 56.14%. Moisture, crude fat, protein and ash contents were significantly different than crude fiber and carbohydrate. The functional properties showed higher values for dehulled than undehulled okpokoro flour. The emulsion capacity 4.35 (ml/g) for dehulled and 3.03 (ml/g) for undehulled; foam capacity 31.67% for dehulled and 25.33% for undehulled; bulk density 0.82 (ml/g) and 0.88(ml/g) water absorption capacity 2.238 (ml/g) for dehulled and 1.98(ml/g) for undehulled etc., showing that the dehulled okpokoro flour had better functional potentials than the undehulled flour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".