A Joint Deep Recommendation Framework for Location‐Based Social Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Location‐based social networks, such as Yelp and Tripadvisor, which allow users to share experiences about visited locations with their friends, have gained increasing popularity in recent years. However, as more locations become available, the need for accurate systems able to present personalized suggestions arises. By providing such service, point‐of‐interest recommender systems have attracted much interest from different societies, leading to improved methods and techniques. Deep learning provides an exciting opportunity to further enhance these systems, by utilizing additional data to understand users’ preferences better. In this work we propose Textual and Contextual Embedding-based Neural Recommender (TCENR), a deep framework that employs contextual data, such as users’ social networks and locations’ geo‐spatial data, along with textual reviews. To make best use of these inputs, we utilize multiple types of deep neural networks that are best suited for each type of data. TCENR adopts the popular multilayer perceptrons to analyze historical activities in the system, while the learning of textual reviews is achieved using two variations of the suggested framework. One is based on convolutional neural networks to extract meaningful data from textual reviews, and the other employs recurrent neural networks. Our proposed network is evaluated over the Yelp dataset and found to outperform multiple state‐of‐the‐art baselines in terms of accuracy, mean squared error, precision, and recall. In addition, we provide further insight into the design selections and hyperparameters of our recommender system, hoping to shed light on the benefit of deep learning for location‐based social network recommendation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".