MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922912264 · doi:10.1139/cjpp-2019-0060

Developmental and sex differences in cardiac tolerance to ischemia–reperfusion injury: the role of mitochondria

2019· review· en· W2922912264 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
B Ošťádal, Z Drahota, J Houštěk, Marie Milerová, I Ošťádalová, Markéta Hlaváčková

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGrantová Agentura České Republiky
KeywordsMPTPMitochondrial permeability transition poreMitochondrionIschemiaCalciumInternal medicineEndocrinologyMitochondrial membrane transport proteinReperfusion injuryBiologyMedicineProgrammed cell deathCell biologyBiochemistryInner mitochondrial membraneApoptosisDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Age and sex play an essential role in the cardiac tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion injury: cardiac resistance significantly decreases during postnatal maturation and the female heart is more tolerant than the male myocardium. It is widely accepted that mitochondrial dysfunction, and particularly mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) opening, plays a major role in determining the extent of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. We have observed that the MPTP sensitivity to the calcium load differs in mitochondria isolated from neonatal and adult myocardium, as well as from adult male and female hearts. Neonatal and female mitochondria are more resistant both in the extent and in the rate of mitochondrial swelling induced by high calcium concentration. Our data further suggest that age- and sex-dependent specificity of the MPTP is not the result of different amounts of ATP synthase and cyclophilin D: neonatal and adult hearts, similarly as the male and female hearts, contain comparable amounts of MPTP and its regulatory protein cyclophilin D. We can speculate that the lower sensitivity of MPTP to the calcium-induced swelling may be related to the higher ischemic tolerance of both neonatal and female myocardium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207