MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922964732 · doi:10.12968/jprp.2019.1.1.44

Achieving Royal Pharmaceutical Society competencies: a frailty nurse's perspective

2019· article· en· W2922964732 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joanna Banks

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Prescribing Practice · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeprescribingPerspective (graphical)Pharmaceutical careMedicineQuarter (Canadian coin)GerontologyGeriatricsHealth careOlder peopleNursingFamily medicinePolypharmacyIntensive care medicinePsychiatryPharmacyHistoryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frailty is related to the ageing process and describes how a person's inbuilt reserve struggles to withstand major changes in health, such as infection, a change to medication or a new environment. The British Geriatric Society (2014) approximate that around 10% of people over the age of 65 years have frailty rising to between a quarter to a half of those aged over 85 years. Patients who are deemed frail are often at risk of adverse outcomes; therefore, it is important to seek out these individuals and care for them appropriately. This includes carrying out regular medication reviews and deprescribing where necessary. This article will discuss prescribing for frail patients using the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Competency Framework for all Prescribers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0110.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Prescribing PracticeSame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207