MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922990580 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-117405

Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Acute Leukemia

2018· article· en· W2922990580 on OpenAlexaffabout
Fatimah Al‐Ani, Yimin Pearl Wang, Alejandro Lazo‐Langner

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeutropenia and Cancer Infections
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeAcute leukemiaInternal medicineUnivariate analysisRetrospective cohort studyPopulationProportional hazards modelLeukemiaSurgeryMultivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The impact of venous thromboembolism (VTE) on morbidity and mortality is significant in hematological cancer patients, including acute leukemia (AL). However, VTE in AL receives little attention in comparison to other more frequently occurring complications. Identifying risk factors for the development of VTE among patients with AL will enable clinicians to stratify their patients according to their VTE risk and consider them accordingly for tailored surveillance or prophylaxis strategies. Methods: We aimed to derive a prediction rule for assessing VTE risk in AL patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) diagnosed between June 2006 and June 2017 at the London Health Sciences Centre, a tertiary care center in London, Ontario, Canada. Included participants were followed from diagnosis until last follow up, the occurrence of VTE, or death. Potential predictors were compared between groups using χ2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and T tests for continuous variables. Potentially significant predictors were evaluated using logistic regression and Cox regression analysis. A risk score was derived based on weighed variables included in the final model and compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: A total of 396 patients with AL (335 AML and 61 ALL) were included in the preliminary analysis. Population characteristics are shown in the Table. VTE occurred in 68 (17%) patients. Median time to VTE was 3 months (Interquartile range 1-5). In univariate analysis a diagnosis of ALL, prior history of VTE, platelet count at presentation and the number of attempts for line insertion were potential predictors. However, in multivariate analysis only ALL diagnosis and prior history of VTE remained significant. A score was derived based on these predictors (ALL 1 point; Prior VTE 2 points). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed good discrimination between categories (Figure; Log-rank p<0.001). Conclusion: We derived a score predictive of VTE in acute leukemia patients. Further confirmatory and validation studies are ongoing. Disclaimer. FA-A is a fellow of the CanVECTOR Network; ALL-L is an investigator of the CanVECTOR Network. This study was funded by the CanVECTOR Network which receives grant funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding Reference: CDT-142654). Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFrench-language works237,207