MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2922993732

Moral Panic and Embodied Threat: The Discourse on Criminal Deportation and Youth Experiences of Violence in Canada

2014· article· en· W2922993732 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Kathryn Ungard

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Deviance, and Social Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMoral panicDeportationEmbodied cognitionCriminologyPanicPsychologyPolitical scienceSociologySocial psychologyImmigrationLawPsychiatryAnxiety
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bill C-43: Faster Removal of Foreign Criminals Act enacts changes to deportation policy that can be expected to intensify the threat of deportation for racialized youth, their families and communities members, and to exacerbate existing social divisions in Canada. This paper argues that these changes to Canadian deportation policy advance to new heights the criminalization and alienation of Blackness while maintaining a national mythology of a benevolent and humanitarian nation. This paper conducts a critical discourse analysis of the major House of Commons political debates on Bill C-43, which adapts and applies the moral panic framework and folk devil figure from Hall and others (1978), revealing the ways in which they are employed within the Canadian discourse on deportation. The debate is analyzed in light of an extensive literature review that explores the history of criminalization of immigrants and prior deportation legislation in Canada. This analysis reveals how prominent tropes of the benevolent and multicultural Canadian state, and the demonized figure of the criminal immigrant are invoked across party lines to reignite a moral panic around immigrant criminality. By bringing together activist and academic anti-racist and anti-oppressive theory, the paper opens new pathways to understanding the complex socio-historical factors that operate within and emerge from these debates. It puts this discussion in conversation with an interdisciplinary archive including diasporic thought and critical prison studies, which usefully analyze the interconnectedness of racism, incarceration, and displacement, an analysis which I extend to deportation. In addition, critical border studies are mobilized to locate the criminalization of immigrants in the context of the restriction of Canadian borders. Building on the work of McKittrick (2006) on Black geographies, the paper coins the concept of "alienation" to describe the psychic and physical displacement experienced by racialized subjects in Canada, through social, cultural and political dispossession, incarceration, and finally deportation. Grounded in the socio-historical context of colonization, conquest and racist immigration policy, this work destabilizes the national mythology that displaces and criminalizes Blackness in Canada by tracing the roots of systemic violence in the Canadian nation state and unsettling it as the basis of permanent removal of racialized subjects from national borders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0710.056
Scholarly communication0.0170.004
Open science0.0040.010
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)Same topicCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlFrench-language works237,207