MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923024105

Cardiovascular remote monitoring system with Electronic Health Record

2010· article· en· W2923024105 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCMBES Proceedings · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUSBComputer scienceTracking systemWorld Wide WebComputer securityDatabaseOperating systemSoftwareArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause for death in developed countries. Measuring and Tracking the heart parameters with less cost can benefits the public health directly. This paper proposes a cardiovascular remote monitoring system which collects data from ubiquitous computing device with ECG, Blood Pressure (BP), and Oximeter sensors. The monitoring device has USB connectivity which is widely used with Personal Computer and many other portable devices. It stores the data at local and sends a copy to data processing center for analysis. The communicating message follows HL7 Version 3 standard and can be used to exchange information among different Health Information Systems. Users can manage their own health information by visiting the website hosted at server side. The processing center includes a Decision Support System which analyzes cardiovascular data with related models. It also learns from doctor’s decisions for self wellness purpose. The whole system is portable, low cost, and easy to use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it