MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923056545 · doi:10.3389/fncir.2019.00019

Editorial: Neuronal Co-transmission

2019· editorial· en· W2923056545 on OpenAlexafffund
John Apergis‐Schoute, Geoffrey Burnstock, Michael P. Nusbaum, David Parker, M.A. Morales, Louis‐Éric Trudeau, Erik Svensson

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neural Circuits · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsNeuroscienceTransmission (telecommunications)PsychologyNeurotransmissionComputer scienceBiologyTelecommunicationsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuronal Co-transmissionNeuronal co-transmission is now well-established as an aspect of nervous system function.However, this was not always the case, and acceptance of this important principle has required extensive work in a range of invertebrate and vertebrate systems (see Svensson et al. for a historical perspective).This work is reviewed in articles in this research topic, which we highlight in this Editorial.A common principle highlighted by several articles in this research topic is that neuropeptides stored in dense core vesicles (DCVs) are co-localized with amines, and also with "classical" small molecule neurotransmitters stored in small synaptic vesicles in single terminals (SSVs; see Cropper et al.; Hökfelt et al.; Merighi; Nässel; Trudeau and El Mestikawy; Svensson et al.). SSVs can co-store and co-release protons and ATP, which can also elicit postsynaptic responses (Soto et al.; Svensson et al.). Soto et al. show that changes in extracellular pH activate acid sensing ion channels, and they discuss whether this is a synaptically-restricted signal or a volume modulator of neuron excitability.Co-transmission in invertebrate neuronal circuits is highlighted by Nässel, Cropper et al., and Svensson et al.. Nässel summarizes the co-localization of neuropeptides and small molecule transmitters in Drosophila neuroendocrine cells, interneurons, and sensory and motor neurons, in circuits that influence learning and memory, circadian rhythms, and sensory, reproductive, developmental, and homeostatic functions.The circuit-related action of neuropeptides has been characterized in feeding circuits in the decapod crustacean stomatogastric ganglion (see the detailed discussion in Svensson et al.) and the Aplysia californica buccal ganglia (Cropper et al.).In Aplysia, analysis of the postsynaptic consequences of parallel neuropeptide actions has generated novel insights into the combinatorial effects of neuromodulators (Cropper et al.).Cropper et al. also address the role of different presynaptic activity patterns in the release of neuropeptides, an important aspect required for understanding the endogenous release of co-localized transmitters.Neuronal co-transmission has also been studied in vertebrate spinal circuits, both in dorsal horn sensory pathways and in spinal circuits involved in locomotion (see Svensson et al.).The mammalian peripheral nervous system has been an important preparation for studying cotransmission in relation to autonomic responses, and it provided some of the key early physiological evidence for co-localization (Burnstock, 1976; see Svensson et al.).For example, in sympathetic neurons in the rat superior cervical ganglion acetylcholine and GABA are found in the same neurons, albeit segregated into different axonal varicosities (this has been defined as co-existence

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Neural CircuitsSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207