MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923056545 · doi:10.3389/fncir.2019.00019

Editorial: Neuronal Co-transmission

2019· editorial· en· W2923056545 on OpenAlexafffund
John Apergis‐Schoute, Geoffrey Burnstock, Michael P. Nusbaum, David Parker, M.A. Morales, Louis‐Éric Trudeau, Erik Svensson

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neural Circuits · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsNeuroscienceTransmission (telecommunications)PsychologyNeurotransmissionComputer scienceBiologyTelecommunicationsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuronal co-transmission is now well-established as an aspect of nervous system function. However, this was not always the case, and acceptance of this important principle has required extensive work in a range of invertebrate and vertebrate systems (see Svensson et al. for a historical perspective). This work is reviewed in articles in this research topic, which we highlight in this Editorial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Neural CircuitsSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207