Experimental Investigation of the Damage Mechanisms of Drilling Mud in Fractured Tight gas Reservoir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mud pollution seriously restricts the development of tight gas reservoirs. For the Dabei tight gas field in Tarim Basin, lots of wells show a higher skin factor on the pressure buildup test curves after drilling. Little researches on mud damage have been conducted for the fracture gas reservoir. Based on the previous researches, a dynamic filtration experimental method utilizing full diameter cores is established for fracture-porous cores under reservoir temperature. Twelve sets of dynamic filtration tests with full diameter cores (D = 10 cm) on the established device and some cuttings microscopic analysis on environmental-scanning-electron microscope/energy dispersive X-ray detector (ESEM/EDX) have been conducted. The effects of core type, fracture width, pressure difference, and mud type on mud damage are all investigated. The results show that the fractured cores suffer a more serious damage degree and exhibit lower return permeability ratio, compared with the porous cores. And the damage degree of fractured cores is proportional to the fracture width and pressure difference. The solids invasion is the key factor damaging the fractured cores, while the porous is mainly impaired by the filtrate invasion. This paper provides a scientific, in-depth understanding of the behaviors, laws, and characteristics of mud damage in fractured and porous cores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".