MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923126305 · doi:10.1109/tpds.2019.2907537

CASpMV: A Customized and Accelerative SpMV Framework for the Sunway TaihuLight

2019· article· en· W2923126305 on OpenAlexaff
Guoqing Xiao, Kenli Li, Yuedan Chen, Wangquan He, Albert Y. Zomaya, Tao Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersHunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for PostgraduateChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceParallel computingSupercomputerScalabilityMemory hierarchyOverhead (engineering)Computer architectureOperating systemCache

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sunway TaihuLight, equipped with 10 million cores, is currently the world's third fastest supercomputer. SpMV is one of core algorithms in many high-performance computing applications. This paper implements a fine-grained design for generic parallel SpMV based on the special Sunway architecture and finds three main performance limitations, i.e., storage limitation, load imbalance, and huge overhead of irregular memory accesses. To address these problems, this paper introduces a customized and accelerative framework for SpMV (CASpMV) on the Sunway. The CASpMV customizes an auto-tuning four-way partition scheme for SpMV based on the proposed statistical model, which describes the sparse matrix structure characteristics, to make it better fit in with the computing architecture and memory hierarchy of the Sunway. Moreover, the CASpMV provides an accelerative method and customized optimizations to avoid irregular memory accesses and further improve its performance on the Sunway. Our CASpMV achieves a performance improvement that ranges from 588.05 to 2118.62 percent over the generic parallel SpMV on a CG (which corresponds to an MPI process) of the Sunway on average and has good scalability on multiple CGs. The performance comparisons of the CASpMV with state-of-the-art methods on the Sunway indicate that the sparsity and irregularity of data structures have less impact on CASpMV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed SystemsSame topicNetwork Packet Processing and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207