Entre attachement aux lieux et gestion de la reconstruction post-sinistre : l’action municipale au centre-ville de Lac-Mégantic, Québec (Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se basant sur une recherche qualitative réalisée à la suite de la tragédie ferroviaire de Lac-Mégantic (Québec, Canada), cet article explore la manière dont les autorités ont pris en charge la reconstruction des lieux sinistrés et prennent en compte les significations et les liens au territoire lorsqu’il est si violemment atteint par une catastrophe et par ses réaménagements. Les principaux lieux significatifs de Lac-Mégantic ont été identifiés, ainsi que les réponses mises en place par les autorités. À partir du concept de lien d’attachement au lieu et de ses modélisations, l’analyse mobilise quatre dimensions du sens aux lieux, l’identité, la fonctionnalité, l’univers social et la nature. L’étude entend offrir une contribution à l’anthropologie des catastrophes en démontrant que les lieux significatifs sont au cœur des enjeux du processus de gestion de la catastrophe et de la reconstruction à Lac-Mégantic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".