MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923245303 · doi:10.1306/1115181617017043

Temperature and pressure characteristics of Ordovician gas condensate reservoirs in the Tazhong area, Tarim Basin, northwestern China

2019· article· en· W2923245303 on OpenAlexaff
Yifeng Liu, Nansheng Qiu, Wenxuan Hu, Huili Li, Fangyu Shen, Qianying Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTarim basinGeologyOrdovicianGeomorphologySichuan basinChinaStructural basinPetrologyGeochemistryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the temperature and pressure distribution characteristics and their evolution in the Upper Ordovician strata in the Tazhong area, Tarim Basin, northwestern China. Based on hundreds of temperature data from boreholes, the present-day temperature ranges from 100°C to 130°C, increasing from the southeast to the northwest and having a “cool” belt in the central fault horst. Pore pressures in the Upper Ordovician reservoirs range from 35 to 62 MPa (5076 to 8992 psi). Overpressures developed in the southwestern region and along the eastern segment of the central fault horst to the northern slope. The Lower Ordovician reservoirs in the east reached 140°C during the Late Ordovician, but those in the west heated continuously and reached the maximum temperature (>130°C) during present day. Paleopressures reconstructed from fluid inclusion data indicate that overpressures caused by hydrocarbon generation were formed in the areas away from fault belts but were absent in the area around the no. 1 fault belt. The temperature evolution indicates that the middle−lower Cambrian source rocks reached gas generation stage (vitrinite reflectance [Ro] > 2.0%) at the end of the Ordovician, whereas the Middle−Upper Ordovician source rocks are still in the high-maturity stage (Ro < 1.3%) at the present day. Deep oil and gas migration is driven by overpressure, and commercial reservoirs are predominantly distributed in the normally pressured zones along the no. 1 fault belt. The formation of gas condensate is controlled by specific temperature and pressure characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAPG BulletinSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207