MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923277362 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v20i3.340

Herding Behavior in the Nairobi Securities Exchange*

2018· article· en· W2923277362 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hamid Tabesh, Logan Kelly, Collins Poulose

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHerdingHerd behaviorFalling (accident)Political instabilityStock exchangeStock marketEconomicsStock (firearms)BusinessMonetary economicsPoliticsFinancial economicsGeographyFinancePsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we use 2010-15 daily data stock market from the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) to investigate herding behavior among NSE market participants. We examine the impact of rising and falling markets, as well as exogenous factors such as political and regulatory instability, on herding behavior. Our findings are twofold. First, herding behavior differs by sector, moreover, each sector responds differently to rising and falling markets. Thus, failing to consider each sector separately may mask herding behavior. Second, herding behavior is most pronounced from 2013 through 2014, which was a time of both political and regulatory instability for Kenya.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207