Vacas locas, ciudadanos desconcertados, ganaderos en crisis... y la responsabilidad ¿de quién?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proportion of individuals >80 years of age constitute an increasing proportion of patients who present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The objective of this study is to evaluate in-hospital outcomes and 1-year survival of very elderly patients who present with an STEMI and undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Between 2009 and 2015, individuals >80 years of age (very elderly patients) with an STEMI presenting at a single tertiary Canadian care center were included in the study. A random sample of 100 individuals aged 65 to 69 years over the same time period were selected as a control group. A total of 284 patients were included in the study population including 100 controls, 164 octogenarians, and 20 nonagenarians. Of total, 1661 pPCIs occurred during this study period with the very elderly population (>80 years) comprising 11.1% of the total pPCIs. Compared with controls, individuals aged >80 are more likely to have a delay in treatment with increased rates of bleeding, acute kidney injury, rehospitalization, and a trend toward longer hospital stays following pPCI for STEMI. Although in-hospital and 1-year mortality were similar between both cohorts >80 years of age with STEMI, their overall survival was reduced compared with controls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".