MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923314964

Optimisation and integration of membrane processes for the fruit juice industry

2005· article· en· W2923314964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frank Lipnizki

Bibliographic record

VenueLund University Publications (Lund University) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiafiltrationUltrafiltration (renal)ChemistryProcess engineeringNanofiltrationPilot plantPulp and paper industryBeverage industryUnit operationMicrofiltrationMembraneChromatographyEngineeringChemical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionMembrane processes can be either used in direct competition with conventional separation processes or in combination with these to cover a wider separation range. The focus of this work is on the applications in an apple juice plant using membrane processes in combination with conventional separation processes, i.e. separators and evaporators.Traditional Apple Juice Plant The traditional apple juice production process is shown. This process involves settling tank(s) and/or kieselguhr filtration for the clarification of apple juice. Both processes are normally regarded as costly and difficult. Additionally, the traditional process includes an evaporation step for the concentration of apple juice above 75 Brix.Apple Juice ClarificationRecently ultrafiltration has established itself as a unit operation to clarify apple juice by removing suspended solids or other high molecular solids such as proteins and starch. So far the industrial standard has been the use of either tubular or Plate&Frame ultrafiltration modules. However, both module configurations are commonly associated with low packing density and high membrane replacement costs. Furthermore, this process is commonly run in batch mode and diafiltration water has to be added in the final stage of the clarification to maximise the process yield. A new concept developed by Alfa Laval combines a high-speed separator with spiral wound ultrafiltration modules to overcome these limitations. The key advantages of new concept are:•High quality juice with respect to colour, taste and clarity.•Elimination of bentonite, gelatine, and kieselguhr. •Lower membrane replacement costs compared to tubular and Plate&Frame modules.•Elimination of diafiltration water. •Continuous operation with long running cycles at stable fluxes. Even though the new clarification concept has slightly higher initial investment costs and an increased number of unit operations this is quickly offset by the advantages. After only two years the lower operating and membrane replacement costs make the investment more profitable.Apple Juice ConcentrationFor the concentration of apple juice, the combination of reverse osmosis and evaporation can provide an interesting process combination. Reverse osmosis, as initial step can remove more than 50% of the water content prior to evaporation, making it possible to significantly reduce overall costs. By applying reverse osmosis concentration levels of 20–25 Brix can be achieved, while the subsequent evaporation can boost these levels to above 75 Brix. The key advantages of new concept are:•Combination of reverse osmosis and evaporation saves up to 25 to 40% energy compared with direct evaporation. •Concentration of 20 to 25 Brix with only 7-9 kWh/m3. •98–99% rejection of sugar and acid. •80–90% rejection of volatile flavours. •Recycling of permeate as process water.Conclusions & OutlookThis case study on apple juice production demonstrates that integration and optimisation of membrane-based separation processes with conventional separation processes such as high-speed separators and evaporators can lead to improved process designs. The two concepts discussed offer both technical and economical advantages compared with stand-alone units. Furthermore, the concepts discussed in this study are not only applicable to apple juice but also suitable for other fruit juices. Overall, this study indicates that the future of membrane processes will rarely be as stand alone process units, but rather it will be as an integrated and optimised part of a process package achieving a predefined separation. Hence, optimisation and integration will play an important role in the future of membrane processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLund University Publications (Lund University)Same topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207