MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923371467 · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15947

A revised representation of urea and ammonia nitrogen recycling and use in the Molly cow model

2019· article· en· W2923371467 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mengmeng Li, Evan C. Titgemeyer, M.D. Hanigan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureAlberta Livestock and Meat AgencyU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsUreaExcretionAnimal scienceChemistryAmmoniaUrinary systemNitrogenBiochemistryEndocrinologyBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurately predicting nitrogen (N) digestion, absorption, and metabolism will allow formulation of diets that more closely match true animal needs from a broad range of feeds, thereby allowing efficiency of N utilization and profit to be maximized. The objectives of this study were to advance representations of N recycling between blood and the gut and urinary N excretion in the Molly cow model. The current work includes enhancements (1) representing ammonia passage to the small intestine; (2) deriving parameters defining urea synthesis and ruminal urea entry rates; (3) adding representations of intestinal urea entry, microbial protein synthesis in the hindgut, and fecal urea-N excretion; and (4) altering existing urinary N excretion equations to scale with body weight and adding purine derivatives as a component of urinary N excretion. After the modifications, prediction errors for ruminal outflows of total N, microbial N, and nonammonia, nonmicrobial N were 29.8, 32.3, and 26.2% of the respective observed mean values. Prediction errors of each were approximately 7 percentage units lower than the corresponding values before model modifications and fitting due primarily to decreased slope bias. The revised model predicted ruminal ammonia and blood urea concentrations with substantially decreased overall error and reductions in slope and mean bias. Prediction errors for gut urea-N entry were decreased from 70.5 to 26.7%, which was also a substantial improvement. Adding purine derivatives to urinary N predictions improved the accuracy of predictions of urinary N output. However, urinary urea-N excretion remains poorly predicted with 69.0% prediction errors, due mostly to overestimated urea-N entry rates. Adding representations of undigested microbial nucleic acids, microbial protein synthesized in the hindgut, and urea-N excretion in feces decreased prediction errors for fecal N excretion from 21.1 to 17.1%. The revised model predicts that urea-N entry into blood accounts for approximately 64% of dietary N intake, of which 64% is recycled to the gut lumen. Between 48 and 67% of the urea recycled to the gut flows into the rumen largely depending on diet, which accounts for 29 to 54% of total ruminal ammonia production, and 65 to 76% of this ammonia-N is captured in microbial protein, which represents 17% of N intake. Based on model simulations, feeding a diet with moderately low crude protein and high rumen-undegradable protein could increase apparent ruminal N efficiency by 20%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207