MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2923405449 · doi:10.1039/c8cp07288d

High-temperature shape memory loss in nitinol: a first principles study

2019· article· en· W2923405449 on OpenAlexafffund
Adebayo A. Adeleke, Yansun Yao

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicShape Memory Alloy Transformations
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon Medical ImagingUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsShape-memory alloyNickel titaniumMaterials scienceSmart materialAlloyCondensed matter physicsMetallurgyComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have performed first-principles calculations to investigate the possibility of shape memory loss in a member of the binary smart alloy family - NiTi. A detailed analysis of the transition kinetics and dynamical pathway reveals the possibility of the B19' phase of NiTi losing its shape memory when subjected to high stress conditions and is heated above a critical temperature, Tc. The B19' phase is predicted to transform to P1[combining macron]-NiTi, which is also predicted to be dynamically stable and temperature-quench recoverable. It is found that the B2(B33) → B19' transition is dominated by the β shearing mode with pronounced distortion in the (001) planes and significant volume reduction. Furthermore, the B19' → P1[combining macron] transition is dominated by the γ shearing mode with pronounced distortion in the (010) planes and slight volume expansion. The cumulative effect of both processes activates the lowering and eventual breaking of symmetry in the precursor phases and drives the permanent deformation and shape memory loss. We further show that the P1[combining macron]-NiTi structure is stabilized (over B19' structure) by kinetics. The findings of this study will stimulate further studies on how to retain and improve the shape memory feature in NiTi and other binary smart alloys to prevent property failure when used in the fabrication of devices operated in the high temperature and pressure regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicShape Memory Alloy TransformationsFrench-language works237,207